Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Metode MFEP Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor

 (*)Yuda Aji Pramukti Mail (Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia)
 Septi Andryana (Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia)

(*) Corresponding Author

Submitted: August 4, 2022; Published: October 25, 2022

Abstract

Vendor is a party in the form of a company that provides goods and services to consumers or other business actors. Pasar Minggu Regional General Hospital is one of the Class B Non-Educational General Hospitals located in the heart of South Jakarta. The selection of vendors at Pasar Minggu Hospital was previously still using the traditional system and had not used it. The traditional method used previously often had several problems, starting from the administration of vendor data that was not accurate, as well as writing vendor data that was always wrong, then there was negligence in vendor assessment, and up to vendor selection that was not in accordance with the right mechanism. From these problems, Pasar Minggu Hospital requires a Decision Support System application in searching for vendors to be selected for a project. Because of this, Pasar Minggu Hospital plans to make a Decision Support System application to carry out the process of selecting the best vendor and in accordance with the criteria determined by the management of Pasar Minggu Hospital. The criteria between vendors include C1 (Finance), C2 (Performance), C3 (Safety) and C4 (Quality). On the Decision Support System website there are 5 menus, namely Company Data, Data Criteria, Criteria Comparison, Assessment Data and Analysis Results. In the calculation using the appropriate AHP consistency ratio of 0.10, it means that the data is declared consistent. And in the MFEP method the total Factor Weight is 9.00 with details of Finance 2.00, work safety 2.00, quality 3.00 and performance 2.00. From the calculation results of the two methods above that the first order of comparison of vendor results is occupied by PT. Bangun Rezeki with a percentage using AHP of 87%, and using MFEP of 71%, in second position by PT. Building Award with a percentage of 81% and 73% with MFEP. And the last position by PT. Ocean figures with a percentage of 72% using AHP and 56% using MFEP.

Keywords


Decision Support System; Vendor; AHP; MFEP

Full Text:

PDF


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 163 times
PDF - 90 times

References

“Apa itu Vendor? Definisi, Tanggung Jawab, Cara Kerja, dan Jenisnya.” https://blog.skillacademy.com/vendor-adalah (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).

“TENTANG KAMI – RSUD Pasar Minggu.” https://rsudpasarminggu.jakarta.go.id/tentang-kami/ (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).

“Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi - Tonni Limbong, Muttaqin Muttaqin, Akbar Iskandar, Agus Perdana Windarto, Janner Simarmata, Mesran Mesran, Oris Krianto Sulaiman, Dodi Siregar, Dicky Nofriansyah, Darmawan Napitupulu, Anjar Wanto - Google Buku.” https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=6FnYDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Sistem+Pendukung+Keputusan&ots=XeNUbxOLmJ&sig=ZqZr3ZS7ivs1fQ9NRLVM4vVkbA0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Sistem Pendukung Keputusan&f=false (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).

M. Iqbal, A. Triayudi, and B. Rahman, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan Dengan Perbandingan Metode AHP dan MFEP,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 768–776, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.30865/MIB.V6I2.3550.

“Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Teknik Penentuan Strategi Daya Saing Ker... - Google Books.” https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Analytical_Hierarchy_Process_AHP_Teknik/WIOYDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=AHP&printsec=frontcover (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).

A. Apriyaningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Project Menerapkan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 542–550, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.47065/TIN.V2I9.1309.

“Buku Ajar: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Teori dan Implementasi - Google Books.” https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Buku_Ajar_Sistem_Pendukung_Keputusan_Teo/TeBjDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=SPK+MFEP&printsec=frontcover (accessed Aug. 11, 2022).

M. Sauqie, I. Budiawan, and U. Nusamandiri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor Telekomunikasi Pada PT. Indosat Menggunakan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP),” J. Infortech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 157–163, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31294/INFORTECH.V3I2.11788.

R. Hardianto et al., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Pemenang Vendor Kontraktor Menggunakan Metode AHP (Studi Kasus Di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kabupaten Agam),” INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 169–176, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.35314/ISI.V1I2.136.

I. Kurnia and A. Muhtarom, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN SISWA TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN PERBANDINGAN METODE AHP DAN SAW,” J. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 164–172, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33387/JIKO.V4I3.3339.

S. Saripah and A. Abdullah, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN CALON PEMENANG VENDOR PROYEK DENGAN METODE ANALITYC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) PADA DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR,” Sist. J. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 54–59, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.32520/STMSI.V4I3.153.

M. Hadi, “Sistem penyeleksian kontraktor untuk sebuah proyek menggunakan logika Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP),” Jun. 2020.

M. S. D. Putra, S. Andryana, Fauziah, and A. Gunaryati, “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method to determine the quality of gemstones,” Adv. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 2018, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/9094380.

C. C. Chou and K. W. Yu, “Application of a new hybrid fuzzy AHP model to the location choice,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2013, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/592138.

S. Destari and B. K. Simpony, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Wedding Organizer Menggunakan Metode AHP,” IJCIT (Indonesian J. Comput. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.31294/IJCIT.V3I2.4665.

F. Annas, D. Ediana, A. Kurniawan, R. Wandira, and S. Zakir, “Decision Support System in Detrmination of Project Vendor Winner Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1779, no. 1, p. 012006, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012006.

A. R., “Web GIS Penentuan Potensi Usaha Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Peocess (AHP).” 2014.

B. Sudarman, “Pengembangan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemenang Vendor Proyek Pada Pt . Sabila Inti,” 2020.

Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Metode MFEP Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA
STMIK Budi Darma
Secretariat: Sisingamangaraja No. 338 Telp 061-7875998
Email: mib.stmikbd@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.