Why Don’t We Ask? A Complementary Method for Assessing the Status of Great Apes

Erik Meijaard, - and Kerrie Mengersen, - and Damayanti Buchori, - and Anton Nurcahyo, - and Marc Ancrenaz, - and Serge Wich, - and Sri Suci Utami Atmoko, - (2011) Why Don’t We Ask? A Complementary Method for Assessing the Status of Great Apes. PLoS ONE, 6 (3). pp. 1-10. ISSN e18008

[img]
Preview
Text
6. Publikasi_Jurnal Internasional -Sri Suci Utami.pdf

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Species conservation is difficult. Threats to species are typically high and immediate. Effective solutions for counteracting these threats, however, require synthesis of high quality evidence, appropriately targeted activities, typically costly implementation, and rapid re-evaluation and adaptation. Conservation management can be ineffective if there is insufficient understanding of the complex ecological, political, socio-cultural, and economic factors that underlie conservation threats. When information about these factors is incomplete, conservation managers may be unaware of the most urgent threats or unable to envision all consequences of potential management strategies. Conservation research aims to address the gap between what is known and what knowledge is needed for effective conservation. Such research, however, generally addresses a subset of the factors that underlie conservation threats, producing a limited, simplistic, and often biased view of complex, real world situations. A combination of approaches is required to provide the complete picture necessary to engage in effective conservation. Orangutan conservation (Pongo spp.) offers an example: standard conservation assessments employ survey methods that focus on ecological variables, but do not usually address the sociocultural factors that underlie threats. Here, we evaluate a complementary survey method based on interviews of nearly 7,000 people in 687 villages in Kalimantan, Indonesia. We address areas of potential methodological weakness in such surveys, including sampling and questionnaire design, respondent biases, statistical analyses, and sensitivity of resultant inferences. We show that interview-based surveys can provide cost-effective and statistically robust methods to better understand poorly known populations of species that are relatively easily identified by local people. Such surveys provide reasonably reliable estimates of relative presence and relative encounter rates of such species, as well as quantifying the main factors that threaten them. We recommend more extensive use of carefully designed and implemented interview surveys, in conjunction with more traditional field methods.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions: Artikel > Biologi
Depositing User: BPSI Unas
Date Deposited: 30 Aug 2017 06:01
Last Modified: 30 Aug 2017 06:01
URI: http://repository.unas.ac.id/id/eprint/179

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item