Analysis of Blended Learning Development in Distance Learning in Variation of Borg & Gall and Addie Models

Dedi Untoroseto; Agung  Triayudi

doi:10.37899/journallamultiapp.v4i6.973

Dedi Untoroseto Faculty of Communication and Information Technology, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Agung Triayudi Faculty of Communication and Information Technology, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37899/journallamultiapp.v4i6.973

Keywords: Blended Learning Learning, Model Variations of Borg, Gall and Addie

Abstract

With the success of blended learning and the use of online media on learning outcomes and from article search results, it shows that there have been many articles that contain blended learning and various media uses, and reviews are needed about it by reviewing existing articles or commonly called literature reviews. Borg & Gall and ADDIE models. The Borg & Gall model and ADDIE are two teaching models used in colleges and universities. ADDIE stands for Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. In the Borg & Gall model, the steps taken are research and information. Research and information is used to collect information about the need for learning evaluation instruments for learning media development courses for students. In the ADDIE model the steps taken are the same as the original which includes aspects of Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Thus, what is needed in this development is a reference about the product procedure to be developed. The description of the development model of Borg and Gall, described as follows; Educational research and development (R&D) is the process used to develop and validate educational products. The validity of interactive blended learning is: (1) according to expert reviews the content of metrics shows a good category (92%), (2) according to expert reviews learning design is in the good category (88%), (3) according to expert reviews learning media shows a good category (86%), Thus, this interactive blended eLearning does not need to be revised and can be used for further research.

References

Abdullah, W. (2018). Model blended learning dalam meningkatkan efektifitas pembelajaran. Fikrotuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Manajemen Islam, 7(1), 855-866. Retrieved from https://neliti.com.

Astuti, P., & Febrian, F. (2019). Blended learning: Studi efektivitas pengembangan konten e-learning di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Tatsqif, 17(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v17i1.972.

Borg, W.R., & Gall, D. (1983). Penelitian Pendidikan. Longman, New York. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19276.26247.

Febrian, F., & Fera, M. (2019). Kualitas perangkat dan keterampilan mengajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika pada mata kuliah micro teaching menggunakan analisis model rasch. Jurnal Gantang, 4(1), 87-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v4i1.1065.

Gunawan, G., Sahidu, H., Susilawati, S., Harjono, A., & Herayanti, L. (2019, December). Learning management system with Moodle to enhance creativity of candidate physics teacher. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1417, No. 1, p. 012078). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012078.

Miswanto, M., Lubis, Z., Arjani, N., & Irawan, M. (2023). Desain dan Uji Kelayakan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs) di Era Hybrid Learning. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-11-2022.2332609.

Rachmadtullah, R., Yustitia, V., Setiawan, B., Fanny, A. M., Pramulia, P., Susiloningsih, W., ... & Ardhian, T. (2020). The challenge of elementary school teachers to encounter superior generation in the 4.0 industrial revolution: Study literature. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4), 1879-1882.

Santi, A. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Blended Learning Pada Mata Kuliah Ekonomi Pembangunan Di Era New Normal. JPEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Keuangan, 6(2), 65-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jpeka.v6n2.p65-78.

Santi, A. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Blended Learning Pada Mata Kuliah Ekonomi Pembangunan Di Era New Normal. JPEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Keuangan, 6(2), 65-78. https://doi.org/0.26740/jpeka.v6n2.p65-78.

Saputra, N., Hikmah, N., Yustitia, V., Saputra, M., Wahab, A., & Junaedi, J. (2021). Implementation of Online Learning Using Online Media, During the Covid 19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 1802-1808.

Setiani, P. P., & Novariyanto, R. A. (2021). Pengembangan Blended Learning Interaktif Pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Mata Kuliah Sejarah Dan Sosiologi. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(2), 252-257.

Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & quantity, 55, 805-826.

Sutisna, M.R., Mulyadi, D., Alinawati, M. (2019). PENGEMBANGAN BLENDED LEARNING DENGAN MODEL FLIPPED CLASSROOM. PEDAGOGIA Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(2), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v17i2.17951.

Zalni, T. Y. (2022). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Model-Model Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Symbiotic: Journal of Biological Education and Science, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32939/symbiotic.v3i1.48.

Zebua, E., & Harefa, A. T. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Blended learning Dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 251-262. https://doi.org/:10.56248/educativo.v1i1.35.